Difference between revisions of "6. EU Added Value"

From Iei
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[IEIBuilder Index]]
 
[[IEIBuilder Index]]
 +
 +
'''This section should be a maximum of 2 pages'''.
  
 
Why is it important that your action is carried out on the European level - compared to a series of
 
Why is it important that your action is carried out on the European level - compared to a series of
Line 5: Line 7:
 
sub-headers (a to c), which are the three sub-criteria of award criterion 4:
 
sub-headers (a to c), which are the three sub-criteria of award criterion 4:
  
*A) '''Evidence of the benefit of EU collaboration''':What will be the added value of this European
+
*'''A) Evidence of the benefit of EU collaboration''':What will be the added value of this European collaboration compared to separate local or national actions? Is this collaboration clearly demonstrated in the specific activities of your work programme?
collaboration compared to separate local or national actions? Is this collaboration clearly
 
demonstrated in the specific activities of your work programme?
 
 
 
*B) '''Geographical focus''':
 
  
*B) Transferability
+
*'''B) Geographical focus''': What are the exact target areas (countries, regions, etc) that your action is addressing? Why did you choose this particular focus? How is this choice in line with the action’sobjectives?
  
'''This section should be a maximum of 2 pages'''.
+
*'''C) Transferability''': What are the potential and the conditions for transferring the results to those parts of the EU which are not directly covered by your proposal? What are your plans andactivities in your Work Programme to initiate this transfer?

Revision as of 15:32, 8 April 2011

IEIBuilder Index

This section should be a maximum of 2 pages.

Why is it important that your action is carried out on the European level - compared to a series of local, regional or national actions? Please describe the EU added value of your proposal following the sub-headers (a to c), which are the three sub-criteria of award criterion 4:

  • A) Evidence of the benefit of EU collaboration:What will be the added value of this European collaboration compared to separate local or national actions? Is this collaboration clearly demonstrated in the specific activities of your work programme?
  • B) Geographical focus: What are the exact target areas (countries, regions, etc) that your action is addressing? Why did you choose this particular focus? How is this choice in line with the action’sobjectives?
  • C) Transferability: What are the potential and the conditions for transferring the results to those parts of the EU which are not directly covered by your proposal? What are your plans andactivities in your Work Programme to initiate this transfer?