Difference between revisions of "6. EU Added Value"
From Iei
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[IEIBuilder Index]] | [[IEIBuilder Index]] | ||
| − | + | Why is it important that your action is carried out on the European level - compared to a series of | |
| + | local, regional or national actions? Please describe the EU added value of your proposal following the | ||
| + | sub-headers (a to c), which are the three sub-criteria of award criterion 4: | ||
| − | *A) Evidence of the benefit of EU collaboration | + | *A) '''Evidence of the benefit of EU collaboration''':What will be the added value of this European |
| + | collaboration compared to separate local or national actions? Is this collaboration clearly | ||
| + | demonstrated in the specific activities of your work programme? | ||
| − | *B) Geographical focus | + | *B) '''Geographical focus''': |
*B) Transferability | *B) Transferability | ||
'''This section should be a maximum of 2 pages'''. | '''This section should be a maximum of 2 pages'''. | ||
Revision as of 15:26, 8 April 2011
Why is it important that your action is carried out on the European level - compared to a series of local, regional or national actions? Please describe the EU added value of your proposal following the sub-headers (a to c), which are the three sub-criteria of award criterion 4:
- A) Evidence of the benefit of EU collaboration:What will be the added value of this European
collaboration compared to separate local or national actions? Is this collaboration clearly demonstrated in the specific activities of your work programme?
- B) Geographical focus:
- B) Transferability
This section should be a maximum of 2 pages.
